Posts

Showing posts with the label Ethics

When the Algorithm Learns Desperation by D. Conterno (2026)

Image
When the Algorithm Learns Desperation by D. Conterno (2026) Algorithmic Wage Discrimination, Surveillance Pricing, and the Case for Non-Zero-Sum Artificial Intelligence Abstract Artificial intelligence was promised to humanity as a servant. In significant sectors of the modern economy it has been deployed as an instrument of extraction. This article examines two documented practices. The first is algorithmic wage discrimination, through which firms use granular behavioural data to pay workers the minimum each individual will accept. The second is surveillance pricing, through which firms use personal data to charge consumers the maximum each individual will tolerate. Both practices share a single logic. They convert intimate knowledge of a human being into leverage against that human being. This article argues that such practices are not accidents of technology. They are the predictable outcome of encoding zero-sum objectives into optimising systems. Drawing on non-zero-sum game th...

Defensive Victimhood and the Legitimation of Revisionism by D. Conterno (2026)

Image
  Defensive Victimhood and the Legitimation of Revisionism: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Adolf Hitler’s Wilhelmshaven Speech (1 April 1939) and Its Contemporary Resonances by D. Conterno (2026) Abstract This short paper applies critical discourse analysis (CDA) to an English-language translation of Adolf Hitler’s public speech delivered at Wilhelmshaven on 1 April 1939. ( https://avalon.law.yale.edu/wwii/blbk20.asp ) The analysis identifies recurring legitimation strategies: a)       National “regeneration” narratives. b)      Victimhood and betrayal framing. c)       Moral-legal inversion (“vital right” over imposed law). d)      Whataboutism via imperial comparisons (notably Palestine). e)       Securitised pre-emption and historical entitlement (Lebensraum). f)         Normalisation of rearmament and bloc formation. ...

FROM REPUBLIC TO “EMPIRE”: A STAR WARS’ PALPATINE-INSPIRED WORST-CASE MODEL FOR THE UNITED STATES IN 2026–2028 by D. Conterno (2026)

Image
  FROM REPUBLIC TO “EMPIRE”: A STAR WARS’ PALPATINE-INSPIRED WORST-CASE MODEL FOR THE UNITED STATES IN 2026–2028 by D. Conterno (2026) Purpose and method (what this is and what it is not) This article is a red-team scenario exercise: a structured “worst-case” pathway that asks, “If democratic backsliding through executive aggrandisement were to accelerate, what might it look like, and what early warning indicators would we watch?” This is a standard analytic technique used to challenge complacency and reduce groupthink; the UK Ministry of Defence’s Red Teaming Handbook describes red teaming as a way to recognise and correct biased or constrained thinking before it hardens into faulty judgement. It is not an assertion that the U.S. government is running a Star Wars like Palpatine plan. It is a stress test of institutions. In democratic-backsliding research, Nancy Bermeo describes a shift away from overt coups towards “executive aggrandisement” and more subtle institutional erosi...